Monday, March 9, 2009

1984 superiority

Two of the most terrifying novels or prophesies of the world could come to are still 1984 and Brave New World. Although these were both written many years ago, they are both very relevant in today’s society. In Brave New World, Huxley believes that the sensual pleasures people lead their lives in will eventually take control of everything, where as Orwell says in 1984 that a governmental power will eventually fear this world into submission. Even though the year of 1984 has past, as Postman says, “We, at least, had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares.” However, this just because the year has come and gone does not mean that the reality of 1984 will never come true. Since a time line has actually been placed to one of these novels, the general public seems to believe that only one holds an impending doom over society, where as it is clear we are closer to the 1984 society than Brave New World’s civilization.

First, if one takes into perspective the idea of doublespeak, it seems that we already have seen this ability to speak around what we are trying to say in order to lull the public into a false sense of security. If one listens to a political speech, no matter the affiliation, it is clear that there are certain words used in order to bamboozle the general population into believing one idea rather than another. Words are powerful, and one in power, such as a high political office, can use this to their power, just like in 1984. When dealing with an illiterate, incompetent population, history will tell you that it is easy to be an absolute ruler, but when you educate the masses, the task to have complete control becomes more difficult. This seems to have lead to more and more elitists throughout the world, needed to make them sound more intelligent in order to fool the masses of now educated peoples. “What Orwell feared were those who would ban books.” (Postman) This is clearly an example of our society because in order to create an absolute power in one place, education and the ability to acquire knowledge would have to be cut off completely. Simply believe that “…There would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.” would not make any sense since most of humanity is educated.

Another point that Orwell had correct was the idea of complete government control without our knowledge. Although my knowledge of government secret procedure is not very lengthy, I am aware that some of the technology they have has enabled they to listen to and track nearly everything one says or types. This type of control with “Big Brother watching” clearly shows that there are many secrets in governments the general public does not know about. “Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information.” Evidently, this has happened is we are all not given every piece of information that could affect things such as our civil liberties.

Huxley did make some relevant points in his idea of the future regarding the expansion of science and the love of pleasure that the public feels. However, Orwell’s somewhat paranoid idea of the control that the government can have, without society even knowing this control is happening, has taken precedence in the world we live in today where power is what nearly all strive for, in their own unique ways.

4 comments:

TrapshootingGirlTSS said...

You discuss how Huxley has made several relevant points when it comes to the expansion of science and the prioritization of personal pleasure...I agree as well. Science is becoming scariliy advanved, especially in the genetic sciences, genetically modifying babies, creating people out of machines, it is completely insane...and it will go too far if it is not restricted...do you agree? The people's love of pleasure, I believe, revolves around the prioritization of trivial aspects of life, as the society of Brave New World does when it comes to thier times at the feelys and casual rendevouz with as many people as they like.

Emar said...

There are so many secrets that our government keeps from us. You addressed the fact that our government secretly monitors our phone calls and our internet activities. I knew that but I had not made the connection to 1984. It is unbelievably similar to Big Brother watching constantly through the telescreens. In 1984, the citizens were aware that Big Brother was always watching and listening. In our society, we are not really supposed to know that our government is tracking every word we type or speak. Which is worse? It's kind of scary that we can actually compare our society with the one in 1984 and find so many similarities.

Big Mac said...

Nice job on the blog. I think it is noteworthy that you acknowledge BNW's relevance to today's society. However I feel that perhaps you could have expanded a bit more on the topic to enhance your credibility further and proved your point with more effectiveness. You certainly made some nice points in your argument that 1984 is more relevant though.

Shay said...

TSS- I do agree that if science is not restricted it will grow too far because eventually, the boundary to be surpassed would be immortality, which is not morally or ethically right, in my opinion. I also agree with your reasoning for the love of pleasure, and since boredom seems to be a driving force in today's world, it leads to comparision between the two societys.

Emar- I think that our society, where we are not suppose to know the government is watching, is worse. If more people were concious of it, like in 1984, I think there would be less paranoia because the fact that it is happening would be out there for all to see. Also, if you are aware someone is watching you, I would think that you would be more careful about the things you said and did.

Big Mac- I agree that I could have expanded more upon BNW, however, I was worried about sounding to "on the fence" about the topic, leading me to the conclusion to only include some examples.